Monday, October 10, 2016

Answers to questions in step 6 - Determining Objectivity

  • Is the information presented with the least possible bias? Does the fact that this history site is written by a Brit and is owned by a British corporation make the information biased towards Britain, or does the author present both sides of the issue fairly?
  • Is the site factual, or does the author try to change the user's mind?
  • Are graphics or imagery used to sway the opinion of the user? Do they sway the viewer? How?
Posted by at

16 comments:

  1. UnknownOctober 12, 2016 at 6:50 AM

    1. they would be bias fully. because the British was there own country. they had there own opinion on WW1
    2. Facts
    3. No

    ReplyDelete
  2. UnknownOctober 12, 2016 at 6:55 AM

    1.they are fully bias because they are their own country and have their own views
    2. facts
    3. no

    ReplyDelete
  3. AnonymousOctober 12, 2016 at 6:56 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. AnonymousOctober 12, 2016 at 6:59 AM

      1. I think he presented both sides fairly.
      2. factual.
      3. No. It gives out information. It doesn't sway the view of the reader.

      Delete
  4. taje mccauleyOctober 12, 2016 at 6:57 AM

    1. it was unfair because the British was there own country and had they own opinion
    2. facts
    3. no

    ReplyDelete
  5. UnknownOctober 12, 2016 at 6:59 AM

    1.they are fully bias because they are their own country and have their own views
    2. facts
    3. no

    ReplyDelete
  6. UnknownOctober 12, 2016 at 7:01 AM

    1 They are bias on how they see each area and also tells kinda a one-sided area

    2 Factual

    3 No

    ReplyDelete
  7. UnknownOctober 13, 2016 at 6:43 AM

    1. yeah they are bias because they only give one side
    2. factual
    3. no

    ReplyDelete
  8. UnknownOctober 13, 2016 at 6:52 AM

    1.) Yes, mainly because they had a one-sided opinion
    2.) Factual
    3.) Nope

    ReplyDelete
  9. UnknownOctober 13, 2016 at 7:01 AM

    1. bias because they are their own country
    2. facts
    3. no, doesn't say the view of the reader

    ReplyDelete
  10. UnknownOctober 14, 2016 at 7:34 AM

    1. yes bias because they only give one side
    2. Factual
    3. No

    ReplyDelete
  11. UnknownOctober 14, 2016 at 7:34 AM

    1. They are biased because they have an opinion based on only one of the sides.
    2. Factual
    3. No

    ReplyDelete
  12. UnknownOctober 14, 2016 at 7:37 AM

    1. The information presented in this paper can be considered bias since the person that typed this paper is from Britain and his paper has a one-sided opinion on the topic
    2. The paper was factual
    3. No, the graphics presented do not sway the readers opinion

    ReplyDelete
  13. UnknownOctober 14, 2016 at 7:41 AM

    1. yes bias because they only give one side
    2. Factual
    3. No

    ReplyDelete
  14. UnknownOctober 19, 2016 at 3:04 PM

    1. Yes it could be argued that this article is biased because its one person instead of a team. Also the minimal sources opens the door to opinions and false facts. He is also from Britain.
    2. This paper/article is definitely more factual as its not trying to make an argument or persuade.
    3. The graphics hardly, if at all sway you even though they revolve slightly more towards Britich/European facts.

    ReplyDelete
  15. AnonymousNovember 9, 2016 at 5:18 PM

    1. Bias because it is written from one sides opinion not multiple sides.
    2. Yes it's factual
    3. No it doesn't try to change the readers opinion

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)