Answers to questions in Step 7 -- evaluating the source
If you were writing a research paper for your freshman composition class on this topic, would this be a source you could use? Why or why not?
If your teacher asked you why you chose to use this source, what reasons would you give your teacher to justify your choice?
If you did not think that this would be a credible source, where might you look for a more credible source?
Finally, write a 3-5 sentence annotation (summary) of this source that evaluates its credibility and states why this source is or is not credible.
1. yes because it is a reliable and creditable source
ReplyDelete2. its a reliable and creditable source and its a trusted author
3. a world war one encyclopedia or expert
4. The author is a senior lecturer in the department of war studies at the royal military academy. Hes been in BBCs timewatch tv show. He knows all about old wars and history.
1. yes because it is a reliable and creditable source
ReplyDelete2. its a reliable and creditable source and its a trusted author
3. A WW1 encyclopedia or expert
4. The author is a senior lecturer in the department of war studies at the royal military academy.Hes been in BBCs timewatch t.v show. He knows all about old wars and history
1. yes it was a creditable source and reliable
ReplyDelete2. reliable and creditable source
3. ww1 encyclopedia
4. a senior lecturer in the department of war studies at the royal military academy.
1. Yes. Many facts. Stated, and shows where they got their information from
ReplyDelete2. The author gives out facts, not only random facts, but he states it through out his writing.
3. https://www.theworldwar.org
4. Dr Stephen Badsey. A Senior lecturer in The Department of War Studies.
1 Yes, it's a reliable and a credible source
ReplyDelete2 It's a reliable and credible source and the author is trusted
3 If not it could be a world war one encyclopedia or an expert
4 The author does have a lot of credibility due to being a senior lecturer in the Department of War Studies at the Royal Military Academy. He also is in theories of warfare and military-media relations, and he has been on BBCs Timewatch.
1.) Yup, factual, reliable, and creditable sources
ReplyDelete2.) The author is trusted. He also states many facts and is a creditable source.
3.) A expert or World War I encylopedia
4.) Dr. Stephen Badsey is a senior lecturer in the Department of War Studies.
1. yes, reliable and credible source
ReplyDelete2. author is trusted so yes, he uses a lot of facts
3. a WWI expert or encyclopedia
4. Dr. Stephen Badsey, a senior lecturer in the department of was studies
1. yeah because it is a reliable and credible source with a lot of facts
ReplyDelete2. because it is a reliable source and it has a lot of good information
3. WWI encyclopedia
4. The author is a senior lecturer in the Department of War Studies. He also gives several sources. He has also appeared on BBCs Timewatch
1. yes because it is a reliable and credible source with lots of facts
ReplyDelete2. bc it is reliable and gives good info
3. WW1 encyclopedia
4. The author is a senior lecturer in the department of war studies. he also gives lots of sources. He also has appeared on BBCs Timewatch
1. Yes, it is credible and reliable
ReplyDelete2. The author is trusted and gives reliable and credible source.
3. WWI encyclopedia
4. Dr. Stephen Badsey. He is in the department of war studies as the senior lecturer.
1. yes, reliable and credible source
ReplyDelete2. author is trusted so yes, he uses a lot of facts
3. a WWI expert or encyclopedia
4. Dr. Stephen Badsey, a senior lecturer in the department of was studies
1. Yes, this source has factual information that I could use with sources that are credible
ReplyDelete2. This website has sources to show where they obtained their info, and the author is credible as well
3. You could find more credible sources using Destiny, or you could find a WW1 encyclopedia
4. In my opinion, this site is definitely a credible source of information. The author is a senior lecturer on this topic, he has credible links to his work cited, and he gives factual information on WW1
1. In my opinion I do believe this has enough credible information to be used for A FEW facts. This definitely wouldn't be the focus of my papers research.
ReplyDelete2. I would say the reason I chose this is because its written by a well educated professor who also used multiple sources.
3. If I didn't trust this article I would look on the Destiny search engine or look for formal books and websites by actually established historians.
4. This source is trustworthy to an extent because t covers multiple topics, has multiple sources, and links websites in the bio. It isn't the greatest webpage/article for information or a lack there of. However, for a few quick facts theres nothing wrong with this article.
1. Yes multiple facts were stated that are credible.
ReplyDelete2. The site listed credible sources
3.You could use a encyclopedia or university.
4. Personally I believe this site is trustworthy and credible.